Monday, April 8, 2013

Gender discrimination in the military


Gender discrimination in the military
By: Tonio Winkler

          Gender discrimination has affected not just regular civilian jobs, but the careers that take bravery and courage. This organization restricts individuals regardless of their merits or status in the organization. Also it has carved its way into American history with rifles and bombs. Nevertheless, the United States army social justice system is under attack, in the end producing irony. The armed services have spent millions marketing to men and woman the possibilities and door openings that await their enlistment. However, many have come to find that the phrase “equal opportunity employer” is a double-sided coin. “Women are generally more likely than men to leave the military” (Febbraro, 2010). Women have for far to long been discriminated and harassed in the male-dominated military profession. Until a reform to the armed services is initiated, social justice will fail and change will not happen.

          The armed services have traditionally been a male dominated profession, which in the end was a factor in female discrimination. “Soldiering around the world is commonly a male-dominated profession that breeds an excessively masculine environment. In these circumstances, women have to learn to communicate in masculine ways in order to be effective” (Angle, 2010). Given the environment, women have to find ways to match the masculinity of their male counterparts. In typical war scenarios that one may see in movies, the strong men are the survivors. One must understand that, “The nature of the profession demands that armies be aggressive, vigilant and unerring in their propensity to deliver lethal force against enemies. Traditional feminine qualities are seen as weak and equated with defeat on the battlefield” (Angle, 2010). Nevertheless, the armed services must understand the tactics to warfare have changed greatly. A more modern warfare approach is seen today which produces very little hand-to-hand combat with the enemy. But, the mentality of women being weaker in combat is still viewed, which is key to discrimination.

          In addition, the banning of woman serving in ground combat jobs, including infantry roles, will produce limited justice for them in the military. “The infantry soldier is the foundation of any army and ironically dubbed the Queen of Battle” (O'Toole, 2012). For many, the ground infantry are the backbone to any army.  Having an insufficient lack of strong military force will only produce the loss of a war. Therefore, understanding this concept, few understand that men alone do not produce this. “The reason for increase in women’s enlistment is the change in the nature of warfare” (Jeanes, 2011). Once again, having the strongest force is not by muscle alone. Wars today are not fought with sword and shield but by intelligence and modern technology. Allowing women to assist in combat related roles will provide a broader and intelligent view to military strategies. 

          Furthermore, woman in the military face sexism and frequent sexual assaults. “A servicewoman was nearly 180 times more likely to have become a victim of military sexual assault (MSA) in the past year than to have died while deployed during the last 11 years of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan” (O'Toole, 2012). Women in the military are fighting two battles, one for their country and to protect themselves. Due to the system currently in place, assaulted females are under intense conditions. Unlike the civilian assault system, the system that military woman face is broken. Under the military system, the commander is responsible for reviewing the initial report and determining whether there is sufficient evidence to take action. “The issue is that one in for service member victims doesn’t report assault because the person to whom they must report is the perpetrator” (O'Toole, 2012). As a result, the victims have nowhere to go and can continue down a dark path.

          In conclusion, gender discrimination in the military has produced job-stereotyping and harassment. From an organizational performance standpoint, turnover and employee well-being are highly effected. With gender inequality, woman will find it harder to move up the ranks such as officer or sergeant. With lack of promotion or constant abuse they will quit and create a high turnover rate.  With this turnover, the army will loose the great knowledge and wisdom that women bring to the table. As discussed in class, a high turnover rate can drop the morale of the entire organization. Students planning a career in the military can be better prepared for gender issues by learning from this article. Having this knowledge will help combat the gender issues that may arise and help deter it.


References

Angle, J. (2010, January 18). Gender discrimination in military is unfair, unprofessional. Retrieved from The Daily Campus: http://www.dailycampus.com/2.7438/gender-discrimination-in-military-is-unfair-unprofessional-1.1049513#.UVuEgr9E8Vs

Febbraro, A. (2010). Gender and Military Psychology. Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology , 671-696.

Jeanes, E. (2011). Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization . Britain: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

O'Toole, M. (2012, October 6). Military Sexual Assault Epidemic Continues To Claim Victims As Defense Department Fails Females. Retrieved March 15, 2013, from The Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/06/military-sexual-assault-defense-department_n_1834196.html




No comments:

Post a Comment